Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A question on LR v PS
From: passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro)
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:35:39 -0400
References: <19b6d42d1003202138h3f8984b7kc5a5b04ec518f5d6@mail.gmail.com> <p06230905c7cb55c1e18b@192.168.1.5>

But can you not do in Adobe Bridge what you say you can do in LR? It appears
you can process raw files and adjust them, though I haven't figured out
quite *how *yet. But I've read you can.  And you can definitely batch and
label and keyword and organize....  I ask in order to save myself another
100 bucks.

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Henning Wulff <henningw at 
archiphoto.com>wrote:P
>
>
> LR and PS use the same basic engine, ie, Adobe Camera Raw to process raw
> files, but they have a completely different interface and audience.
>
> PS is for people (and their images) who want to work on one image at a
> time, and do lots of things to it.
>
> LR is for people who shoot a lot of photos, want to organize them into
> topics, groups, etc and want to quickly sort through them, pick the good
> ones and batcvh process them in a more 'photographer' intuitive way. Almost
> always LR is better for photographers and PS is more for graphic designers,
> or for final finishes on a special photograph that LR doesn't have all the
> tools for. In that sense PS augments LR, but in LR you can process 50 
> photos
> for most parameters in the time that you can do 1 photo in PS, and you have
> a good database as well.
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] A question on LR v PS)
In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] A question on LR v PS)