Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: Why God Made UV Filters
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 09:46:36 -0500
References: <6936541.1272983658796.JavaMail.root@wamui-cynical.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <j2l23a0a61f1005040741o650b49bfncd40e64cca222d1@mail.gmail.com>
 
find this very hard to believe.

what methodology was used to arrive at this conclusion?
was the total life from conception to disposal and feeding measured  
for 40 lb dog and SUV?

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On May 4, 2010, at 9:41 AM, simon jessurun wrote:

> recently learned that having a pet like a medium sized dog has a
> larger carbon footprint then a SUV
Replies: Reply from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] OT: Why God Made UV Filters)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] OT: Why God Made UV Filters)
Message from simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun) ([Leica] OT: Why God Made UV Filters)