Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 01:00:11 -0700
References: <C87B6EB7.13BB%mark@rabinergroup.com> <4C5613CA.1000506@cox.net> <AANLkTina7EBmz8LwxQ-7g1F3b5Diz+o4johNN1XnBptn@mail.gmail.com>

I have one platinum print - a 4x5" contact print done by Ryujie. It's quite
beautiful. He now does digital neg though as it gives him a lot more control
in terms of printing.

I have seen other platinum prints that are not so good.

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> 
wrote:

> I think that contact prints on silver chloride paper tend to look
> best; I still have a pile of Kodak Azo for doing this.  Too many Pt/Pd
> prints get done on papers with surfaces that rob all the resolution
> from the neg anyway, leaving you with something you may aswell ahve
> done with an inkjet neg.  I have an exquisite sample Pt contact print
> from a pre-World War One Ilford Catalogue, back when commercially
> available Pt paper was made.  Commercial Pt paper coated onto a 300
> gsm stock like Forte used for Polywarmtone would just be beautiful.  I
> can only dream.
>
> Marty
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
// photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?)