Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 2500 iso now rant
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:34:13 +0930
References: <AANLkTimMNC0ahYL6+EaNXhX1j2fV1jEY-4gDh-GdQB7m@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimA+nfqTOz2bG=ujzzCv92Z6ZM9J7HGUQ_3-8xo@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinmRRy41gpXgNP=qFaW6xaECQRmRCpgLKSM+fiV@mail.gmail.com>
 
I understand, but I always look for improvement.  And I'm not
"thrashing" Leica either.

I'm at an unfortunate point where my time costs more than any other
consideration.  Any time I dedicate to photography is because I really
want to.  I've worked out that per shot, to the final frame, film and
digital takes me about the same time.  Working with film is
comparatively cheap *for me*, and I prefer my results from it, so I
stick with it [mostly].  I'm not arguing, I'm just telling you what I
would think if it were my shot.

I hope the kitties are well.

Marty
In reply to: Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] 2500 iso now rant)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] 2500 iso now rant)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] 2500 iso now rant)