Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 35 mm format is best?
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:45:06 -0500
References: <380-220108426161316414@M2W121.mail2web.com>

  I really like Nick Brandt's work. I look at "On This Earth" all the 
time for inspiration, though we're a bit short on lions here. I had the 
good fortune to attend a seminar by a Famous West Coast Photographer who 
was giving a demonstration of pyro developing and bitching about the 
small size of the 4x5 negs he had. This digital thing is like science 
fiction to me. I have a full-frame DSLR with excellent lenses and image 
stabilization - no darkroom and far superior to 35mm film IMHO.

Ken Carney

On 8/26/2010 11:13 AM, wildlightphoto at earthlink.net wrote:
> Frank Dernie wrote:
>
> Would make it hard to get exceptional wildlife or sport shots too, in most
> cases.
> <<<
>
> IDK about sports, but for wildlife "in most cases" is correct, assuming
> commonly accepted technique.  Let's not forget about Nick Brandt
> http://www.nickbrandt.com/ who uses medium-format film, and Elliot Porter's
> birds http://tinyurl.com/29fzr7o photographed with 4x5 Kodachrome.
>
> My favorite Ansel Adams quote is his response when he was asked what the
> best camera is: "the biggest one you're willing to carry".  For myself, the
> "35mm" format strikes a workable balance in my desire to combine high image
> quality and portability.  The image quality potential of bigger formats
> pulls me toward medium-format, the size and weight of the long focal
> lengths I typically use pull me back toward "35mm".  The S2's
> bigger-but-not-too-much-bigger format is pulling me in that direction, the
> present lack of native long lenses and the huge expense of the S2 (and the
> likely size&  weight of long S lenses) is keeping me with "35mm".  Within
> the constraints of "35mm" format. I use Leica not because it's a religious
> icon, but because of the image quality / portability ratio.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
>
> On 26 Aug, 2010, at 15:23, Tina Manley wrote:
>
>> But you should remember that the Leica is also better than MF or LF for
> some
>> uses.  I can't imagine carrying a medium or large format into huts in
>> Central America and trying to document family life without being
> obtrusive.
>> The Leica rangefinder and Leica fast lenses are the absolute best for my
>> purposes.
>>
>> Tina
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Lawrence Zeitlin
> <lrzeitlin at gmail.com>wrote:
>>> I'm sure that by now I have irritated most members of the LUG. It helps
> to
>>> remember that the Leica is just a camera, not a religious icon.
>>>
>>>
>>> Larry Z
>>>
>>>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web LIVE ? Free email based on Microsoft? Exchange technology -
> http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 35 mm format is best?)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] 35 mm format is best?)