Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]As I keep telling all my corporate advisory clients - no point in having the best product in your field if you cannot sell it. A good and successful company always has an intrinsic equilibrium between the influence of the design and marketing teams. Cheers Jayanand On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:53 AM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com>wrote: > Interesting. > I certainly understand what you mean. > > Yet I've never thought of corporate profit as > a purchasing criterion for cameras or lenses; > until this moment. > > Kept buying Leica > through all their economic roller coaster rides > since my first M3 back in the mid '60's; > never thought about their bottom line. > > Just bought, used, and loved their gear. > > And enjoyed the fact that they generally > maintained great resale value. > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > On Sep 9, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > > > Sadly, as much as some of us love Leica SLRs, none of them ever met that > criterion. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >