Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Format output obviousness
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:11:36 +0530
References: <C8B5EDFA.3626%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Mark,
As usual you digress into irrelevancies. The question is, in clear English
so that you should not misunderstand again:

Can you tell the difference between, say, Canon, Nikon and Leica without
knowing beforehand which was used?

Cheers
Jayanand

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at 
rabinergroup.com>wrote:

> Every portfolio I've ever had or stack of prints; and every stack of prints
> other photographers have shown me I've always known which ones of my prints
> were 35mm, Medium format, or sheet film and I didn't have to bother telling
> them and they didn't have to bother telling me; as we all knew at first
> glance.
> I can normally easily tell the difference between a full frame digital
> image
> even at low output and cropped format digital output and I think many
> people
> can with any experience. And certainly the difference between that and
> point
> and shoots with sensors the size of my pinky nail. And the 2x crop in
> between. And medium format digital blows me right out of the water at least
> my eyeballs.
> If you can't tell the difference between your large and smaller format
> digital output the time to hang it up is now.
> Take up audio.
>
> --------------------
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> mark at rabinergroup.com
> .
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Format output obviousness)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Format output obviousness)