Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (no subject)
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:23:18 +0530
References: <32858237.1284551504702.JavaMail.root@wamui-bucket.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <C8B62F54.3663%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I am sure they all look different - but that does not mean I can tell which
camera brand they were shot with, which was my original point. After all,
the point is to sell a product, i.e. the print to another person. Nobody is
going to pay you extra because you shot with a Leica instead of a equivalent
Canon or Nikon. I buy a piece of art because I like it and can live with it
on my wall for a long, long period of time, not because of the equipment
that was used in creating it.

BTW, I have been collecting art and photography for close to 25 years, and I
have a lot of experience in the motivation that drives purchases of art.
Cheers
Jayanand

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
wrote:

> I'm surprised to hear this if your prints are sharing the same gallery
> walls
> and your prints are side to side with other photographers using much
> different techniques than you are then the results of those much different
> techniques; or gear; or format; or choice of ISO's, or glass will show. And
> you're either going to look better or worse for it.
>
> --------------------
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> mark at rabinergroup.com
>
>
> > From: Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net>
> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 04:51:44 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
> > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] (no subject)
> >
> > Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
> >
> >> Art does not work that way. Only magazines and review sites that have to
> >> earn advertising do.
> >> Cheers
> >> Jayanand
> >
> > Art is in the eye of the beholder.  Where I can reduce the number of
> variables
> > to a manageable set, my eye beholds a difference between prints where the
> > original was 35mm film or medium-format film, 35mm film or DMR,
> Kodachrome or
> > Provia, and numerous other comparisons.  Some others have told me they
> > perceive no difference, and many more in blind comparisons see the same
> > differences I do.  Some people are simply more perceptive than others.
> >
> > When I'm making photographs, I've eliminated the photographer, lighting,
> > subject and processing variables.  When I use different tools, I see
> different
> > results in my prints.  I'm not comparing my prints with Salgado's, Tina's
> or
> > anyone else's.  The differences I see are in my prints.
> >
> > Doug Herr
> > Birdman of Sacramento
> > http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> >
> >
> >>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (no subject))