Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica X1
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 01:59:45 -0400

Bifocals wow! try getting progressives they cost a little more but they DO
so much more.. There is no reason a camera like that has to be held at arms
length unless you're auditioning for a Mr. Whipple commercial.

--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
mark at rabinergroup.com


> From: Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at bellsouth.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:55:14 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] leica X1
> 
> That's a deal-breaker for us guys with bifocals. For $2,000, a viewfinder 
> is
> to be expected. It's a shame inasmsuch as the low light performance of the 
> X1
> is pretty spectacular for a compact.
> 
> Jeffery
> 
> On Oct 4, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
> 
>> I dislike having to hold it at arm's length.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Leica X1)
Reply from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Leica X1: now glasses)
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at bellsouth.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] leica X1)