Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Mark, I have varifocals and still find these viewfinderless cameras inconvenient to use, with head tilted right back, and hard to hold still. I do appreciate the varifocals for general use though FD On 5 Oct, 2010, at 06:59, Mark Rabiner wrote: > Bifocals wow! try getting progressives they cost a little more but they DO > so much more.. There is no reason a camera like that has to be held at arms > length unless you're auditioning for a Mr. Whipple commercial. > > -------------------- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > mark at rabinergroup.com > > >> From: Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at bellsouth.net> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 18:55:14 -0500 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] leica X1 >> >> That's a deal-breaker for us guys with bifocals. For $2,000, a viewfinder >> is >> to be expected. It's a shame inasmsuch as the low light performance of >> the X1 >> is pretty spectacular for a compact. >> >> Jeffery >> >> On Oct 4, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: >> >>> I dislike having to hold it at arm's length. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information