Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digi-SLR's and MF lenses.....
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 22:23:27 +0930
References: <017801cc1d8c$fbf6e370$f3e4aa50$@earthlink.net> <BANLkTimUWNnqZdV3g4UEJiVqEY2NLUOwtA@mail.gmail.com> <019601cc1dbf$0fee5b60$2fcb1220$@earthlink.net> <p06230900ca078a035a00@10.1.16.129>

Even gaining 2.5 stops of lens speed won't make the D1 finder 2.5 stops
brighter; modern SLR screens are bundles of fibre optics with microlenses on
the surfaces - they accept light from a very narrow angle, so as you open
the lens wider they transmit proportionally less light.  Randomly scattering
ground glass or plastic is much better for manual focusing, which is why the
R8/9 cameras are so good for

Marty


On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Henning Wulff <henningw at 
archiphoto.com>wrote:

> If you have, why not try it? I had less than stellar results when I had
> one, also about 8008 time but since there's no outlay, use it. You have to
> focus to the approximate range manually with the 300, and the TC16 will do
> the rest. The longer the lens, the more you have to focus manually. Ie, 
> with
> a 50mm lens, you don't have to focus manually unless you're in quite close,
> but with the 300 you'll find yourself continually refocussing manually as
> the AF in the converter runs out of range.
>
> Personally, I always had better results with the 400/6.8 Telyt than with a
> 180 or 300 and the TC16A. YMMV.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 10:12 PM -0700 5/28/11, Frank Filippone wrote:
>
>> Thanks Doug and Jaynard.,....
>>
>> Doug, I agree, the finder in these Digi cameras is for pointing... not
>> focusing.
>>
>> I do actually own a V1.0 of the 80-200 F2.8.....  Unfortunately it does
>> not
>> have a tripod thread.....a BIG disadvantage when trying to use a
>> monopod.........
>>
>> I will go look the 80-400 up.....whoops.... $1-2K.... Out of my
>> league.....
>>
>> Back to the original plan.... the old, MF,  300F2.8 Tamron.....  at least
>> it
>> will be brighter.....
>>
>> OTOH, I do have an AF Telextender made by Nikon  ( TC16A ???) that would
>> convert my lenses to AF in conjunction with my D1x... Any thoughts as to
>> the
>> success of this combo with the MF 300 F2.8??????  ( combo would be a 480mm
>> F4.. nice to have the extra reach)
>>
>> Will try tomorrow to see if it works....
>>
>> Frank Filippone
>> Red735i at earthlink.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> --
>
>      Henning J. Wulff
>  Wulff Photography & Design
> mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
>  http://www.archiphoto.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Digi-SLR's and MF lenses.....)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Digi-SLR's and MF lenses.....)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Digi-SLR's and MF lenses.....)