Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 color balance
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 22:36:27 -0500 (CDT)
References: <p06240800ca6cd45604d1@192.168.1.104> <B358FF6D-68EB-4C9A-87F1-22291E461922@gmail.com> <p06240802ca6ce2e66e72@192.168.1.104> <CAF8hL-F9jiEg_x0mEZ4vFQRtwPKAQnPmZkgmueO1444gfeFkhg@mail.gmail.com>

Why on earth would anyone want to change the white balance again and  
again in post processing?


On Aug 13, 2011, at 10:33 PM, Richard Man wrote:

> That's the beauty of a raw file, even if the WB setting is tagged to
> the file, it does not change the data in the file itself, so you can
> change it again and again in post processing.
>
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Herbert Kanner <kanner at acm.org>  
> wrote:
>> Not true. I saw the rendering of the DNGs three ways. First, which an
>> application called "Just looking" which directly displays a DNG",  
>> second, a
>> contextual menu on the Mac which produces something called "Quick  
>> Look"
>> whose appearance is the same as the first thing I just mentioned,  
>> but it
>> works quicker, and, third, the appearance in LR3 before I apply any
>> corrections.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
> // richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
> previous replies in your msgs. ]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 color balance)
In reply to: Message from leowesson at gmail.com (LeoWesson) ([Leica] M9 color balance)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 color balance)