Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 color balance
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 22:49:42 -0500 (CDT)
References: <p06240800ca6cd45604d1@192.168.1.104> <B358FF6D-68EB-4C9A-87F1-22291E461922@gmail.com> <p06240802ca6ce2e66e72@192.168.1.104> <CAF8hL-F9jiEg_x0mEZ4vFQRtwPKAQnPmZkgmueO1444gfeFkhg@mail.gmail.com> <5545D18F-F381-4982-83FB-78C600A26BE4@usjet.net> <CAF8hL-Hctt0dtdL3b6TyV5FHEp_-wSOB=ktAX+YVgo_oY1A4rg@mail.gmail.com>

It was the 'again and again' I was questioning.


On Aug 13, 2011, at 10:40 PM, Richard Man wrote:

> Because there may not be one correct white balance? e.g.indoor with
> multiple light sources.
>
> That's besides the point though, the point is that the raw file data
> is not changed, whether it's WB, or cropping, or dodge and burn etc.,
> if you use something like Lightroom, Aperture or something similar.
>
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Robert Meier  
> <robertmeier at usjet.net> wrote:
>> Why on earth would anyone want to change the white balance again  
>> and again
>> in post processing?
>>
>>
>> On Aug 13, 2011, at 10:33 PM, Richard Man wrote:
>>
>>> That's the beauty of a raw file, even if the WB setting is tagged to
>>> the file, it does not change the data in the file itself, so you can
>>> change it again and again in post processing.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Herbert Kanner <kanner at acm.org>  
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Not true. I saw the rendering of the DNGs three ways. First,  
>>>> which an
>>>> application called "Just looking" which directly displays a  
>>>> DNG", second,
>>>> a
>>>> contextual menu on the Mac which produces something called  
>>>> "Quick Look"
>>>> whose appearance is the same as the first thing I just  
>>>> mentioned, but it
>>>> works quicker, and, third, the appearance in LR3 before I apply any
>>>> corrections.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
>>> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
>>> // richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
>>> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
>>> previous replies in your msgs. ]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
> // richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
> previous replies in your msgs. ]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] M9 color balance)
Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 color balance)
In reply to: Message from leowesson at gmail.com (LeoWesson) ([Leica] M9 color balance)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 color balance)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] M9 color balance)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 color balance)