[Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom

[montoid at earthlink.net (Montie)]

Well, I rarely respond/contribute to these technical banters
as the answer/solution is always the same...use the appropriate
available tools that best augment your particular time/quality/
production requirements, end of story. Serious pros and amatures
simply keep abreast of what's out there and "Pluck and employ"
as required.

However, to imply that someone has a closed mind for stating his
preference as it applies to his workload...well, "That dog don't
hunt" ;-/

Montie


>>The world is simple when one's mind is closed.

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/


YNWA



On Dec 26, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> http://mansurovs.com/photoshop-vs-lightroom
> Here is a comparison.
> There are hundreds of others you could find in a minute.
> 
> 
> Reading it I found it interesting that Lightroom mirrors ACR adobe camera
> raw. Which is what I get before my image opens in Photoshop.
> There is nothing in Lightroom that is not also in ACR. Other than its
> database driving aspects which is what its really supposed to be doing
> anyway. The image crunching stuff is tacked on. Its a database.
> My main database is Filemaker. I've used that for a bit more than 21 years.
> It also will lighten or darken and so an a picture.
> 
> If I spend ten minutes on an image which is typical I spend eight minutes 
> in
> ACR and two in PS5 (Photoshop).
> The idea of not having those two minutes in PS5 is inconceivable to me.
> Its inconceivable!
> The metaphore for me is trying to develop and print your pictures on your
> light table.
> Wrong room.
> Wrong tool.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark R.