Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]People who do this - Use Photoshop for many of their images after getting them in Lightroom or whatever I have no issue with. I think that should be clear by now. No problem of course with Tina's or Georges workflows. I do have a bit of a problem with the idea that Lightroom is all you need after you buy your camera to digitally deal with your pix. Unless we are dealing with the whole thing on a pretty low level like point and shoot users. And I'd hope people with Leica sensibilities are not dealing on that low of a level. 3 or 4 grand for a lens why not make a commitment to the photograph you make with it? -- Mark R. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/ > From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:47:01 -0800 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom > > Hi Mark, yes, ACR has exactly the same engine as the develop module as > Lightroom. I think I mentioned it a few times. > > My typical workflow is to use LR to catalog and browse the images, do most > of the processing work in LR, and use PS5 for certain images. I have a > couple killer plugin from George DeWolfe that runs under PS5 only and most > of my "final" images go through them. > > > > -- > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information