Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom
From: leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans)
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:13:31 -0800
References: <CB1E60C9.182B4%mark@rabinergroup.com> <967854C2-F347-4295-A662-1D009F1FE068@frozenlight.eu>

Well, Nathan, I guess you are.  I hope some day to become as good as 
low-level point-and-shooter as you are as I, too, do 90% of my stuff now in 
LR and what it can't do, which isn't much, in CS5.

Aram

-----Original Message----- 
From: Nathan Wajsman
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 9:44 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom

I guess then I am a low-level point-and-shooter, because I am perfectly 
happy with the adjustments I make in LR: converting from RAW, cropping, 
spotting if needed, levels, saturation, contrast, sharpening if needed, 
conversion to B&W with superb tone controls. I am not a Photoshop artist but 
a photographer. I am quite happy to restrict myself to the adjustments that 
correspond to what I used to do in the darkroom, and this is where LR 
shines. All that stuff with layers and liquify filters and I don't know what 
is totally unnecessary for me.

The only of the above mentioned activities at which Photoshop is better than 
Lightroom is spotting. For that reason, I still have PS CS 3 which I use on 
my film scans, since they invariably need a lot more spotting than digital 
images.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/


YNWA



On Dec 26, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> People who do this - Use Photoshop for many of their images after getting
> them in Lightroom or whatever I have no issue with. I think that should be
> clear by now. No problem of course with Tina's or Georges workflows.
> I do have a bit of a problem with the idea that Lightroom is all you need
> after you buy your camera to digitally deal with your pix.
> Unless we are dealing with the whole thing on a pretty low level like 
> point
> and shoot users.
> And I'd hope people with Leica sensibilities are not dealing on that low 
> of
> a level.  3 or 4 grand for a lens why not make a commitment to the
> photograph you make with it?
>
> -- 
> Mark R.
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/
>
>
>
>> From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:47:01 -0800
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom
>>
>> Hi Mark, yes, ACR has exactly the same engine as the develop module as
>> Lightroom. I think I mentioned it a few times.
>>
>> My typical workflow is to use LR to catalog and browse the images, do 
>> most
>> of the processing work in LR, and use PS5 for certain images. I have a
>> couple killer plugin from George DeWolfe that runs under PS5 only and 
>> most
>> of my "final" images go through them.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>




In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] photoshop-vs-lightroom)