Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] To the pano stitchers...
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:36:09 +0000
References: <CAF8hL-EzRPAvxMhm52eKS64Owpui77uyL0qtqNBhkYZwz-LtJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 
I would choose a longer lens in portrait and more shots over a wider lens in 
landscape...

john
________________________________________


Other than the difference in number of frames to cover a particular area,
are there image quality differences in using a longer lens rather than a
shorter lens? For example, 25, 35, 50 or 75 on a full frame body, which one
may be better image quality wise?

Thanks for any advice.
Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] To the pano stitchers...)
 In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] To the pano stitchers...)