Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] To the pano stitchers...
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 07:22:02 +0100
References: <CAF8hL-EzRPAvxMhm52eKS64Owpui77uyL0qtqNBhkYZwz-LtJQ@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E93DE8B62C@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

Absolutely. Most of my panos (with the M8, so multiply by 1.33) are done 
with the 35mm or 50mm lenses.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/


YNWA



On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:36 AM, John McMaster wrote:

> I would choose a longer lens in portrait and more shots over a wider lens 
> in landscape...
> 
> john
> ________________________________________
> 
> 
> Other than the difference in number of frames to cover a particular area,
> are there image quality differences in using a longer lens rather than a
> shorter lens? For example, 25, 35, 50 or 75 on a full frame body, which one
> may be better image quality wise?
> 
> Thanks for any advice.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] To the pano stitchers...)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] To the pano stitchers...)