Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The lens does look very passable in these pictures. Of course, they were taken in good light, so I assume you did not use the widest aperture. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ YNWA On Feb 25, 2012, at 7:02 AM, Richard Man wrote: > Busy day with dayjob today so still no substantial testing of the 28/4 > Perar. BTW, the aperture is a cinch to turn with the hood on, unlike the > Pera 35. > > So hope the Holga-Perar doesn't sear your eyes out, here are some more > photos around town: > > Years ago, when we lived in the Boston area, we bought a small press book > called something like "Boston Bad Drivers" (which is a given), and one of > the funniest remarks is that cars should come with a self-inking "Sorry" > stamp on the front bumper. I guess the owner of this car felt similarly: > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/1-20120224-L1009655.jpg > > Graffiti in our Fair City! Gasp! > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/2-20120224-L1009656.jpg > > We have plenty of liberals and "re-defeat Bush 2008" bumper stickers in our > neighborhood. > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/3-20120224-L1009660.jpg > > Stone lantern: > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/4-20120224-L1009661.jpg > > Look! Vignetting for free~! > > -- > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >