Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/03/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:40:07 +0000
References: <013001cd0268$a8bc27d0$fa347770$@earthlink.net> <CB87DFAE.1BA3F%mark@rabinergroup.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E94919DCF2@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>, <C42893B2-8663-42F8-A62A-AF93ECF20B22@mac.com>
It feels good to be part of the 0.01% ;-)
john
________________________________________
On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:30 PM, John McMaster wrote:
> None of the photographers I talk to are fussed about the high ISO, they
> want the best quality which is at the nominal ISO that is standard
> (100-200).
They (and apparently you) are not part of the 99.99% "who know."
;~)
Replies:
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)