Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/04/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti
From: alal at poly.edu (Akhil Lal)
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 20:22:35 -0400
References: <CAAsXt4MggD0Led2FwTjZQPvNnWUDzcC0wnC0yUE7skxjQAYDmA@mail.gmail.com> <002301cd15db$2bd89dd0$8389d970$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CABmfTOXG5g1ZO9AVaj8eEbJF5_LNKaPry9nn4cwsP1zDmXxdtA@mail.gmail.com> <002e01cd15e4$1f45b040$5dd110c0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz>
 
I think this means that your 75's focal length is actually 75.5 mm. Perhaps
someone more knowledgeable can confirm this

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+alal=poly.edu at leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+alal=poly.edu at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of John
McMaster
Sent: 08 April 2012 20:03
To: 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti

Yep, M9 and all lenses went off at the same time. Both the Noctilux and 75mm
Summilux were 6-bit coded during the trip.

As an aside, my 75mm has the number 50 sideways to the m/feet marks - does
that mean it is an 80mm? Are they all like that??

John
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica NJ and Nocti)