Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Leica Monochrome
From: tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:38:22 -0400
References: <6AE48C6E-BE8A-4418-9273-90F9F693A707@mac.com> <41b8eb846731d6b26353e7c18e43acf7@mail.gmail.com> <62F1F3AA-00A9-4F72-842C-FF3E6AC64977@mac.com>
 
On May 10, 2012 at 01:15 PM -0500, George Lottermoser wrote:
>Only if you can rate your Acros at anything from ISO 160 to 10,000;
>and have an instant film processor
>and scanner built into your M3.
>
>No reasonable comparison between M3 and M9-M.
>Different beasts each with unique qualities; output and workflow.

Sure there's a reasonable comparison.  You just did most of one.  With 
Jim's extra bit, it sums up quite a lot.
In reply to: Message from zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams) ([Leica] Leica Monochrome)
Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Leica Monochrome)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Leica Monochrome)