Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Security in Dublin Airport now insist on scanning film
From: doug at ricecracker.net (doug kim)
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 08:25:52 -0400
References: <CAE_AbZDKXHgUQ_6wqM79R4OGAjrqALqg+Z2LaPz24RxP8MNUQQ@mail.gmail.com> <1337185876.66912.YahooMailNeo@web111617.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <6F9E52582EB547FA8A6AAC32C3D354FC@syneticfeba505> <CA+yJO1C=Cycrb2fUOTwoO_k9=KEOVO1SSEhD4TjQ6STiKY-51A@mail.gmail.com> <4DC989D5-EAA2-4137-9C8D-6C0BC0D4F766@frozenlight.eu> <CABmfTOUTY-5HH+DbNnKKzFAjFCDKpZSiBZNWnYjkbtK+U70oBQ@mail.gmail.com> <C1733677-9605-4732-880D-645512DB5794@archiphoto.com>

Henning,

I think you are correct. This is the new world and I had better get used to
it. I travel to Mexico and Budapest next and am already prepared to have my
film zapped.

Doug Kim
o 646.602.7603
c 310.869.0498
--
http://www.ricecracker.net
http://www.bornyogis.com



On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at 
archiphoto.com>wrote:

> Gradually over the last 20 years the xray scanners have been able to make
> do with less and less radiation (this is so the operators don't develop
> funny appendages while still in the employ of security) and I've seen less
> and less damage on film from scanning. The last big trip I did with film
> involved about 200 rolls and was in the Middle East. The film probably went
> through 40 scanners. No film faster than 800, but no damage. As Nathan
> mentioned, the most annoying were those checkpoints (many) where the
> operators were chatting and not even looking at the screen. Many
> checkpoints would not entertain hand checking; it was through the machine
> or you didn't get on the plane/cross the border.
>
> After that I decided that whenever I could, I would take digital. For some
> 120 films I had no digital equivalents, so I still took some film, but very
> little. It's the present reality. Heathrow hasn't allowed hand checking for
> a long time.
>
> Henning
>
>
>
> On 2012-05-17, at 12:50 AM, Marty Deveney wrote:
>
> > http://www.i3a.org/wp-content/uploads/docs/i3afilmxraytestreport.pdf
> >
> > Many countries don't automatically grant a hand inspection of carry-on,
> and
> > in some places there is no ability to provide one.  The standards for
> > scanners also vary.  Dose is cumulative.
> >
> > I fly about 80 sectors/year, sometimes more.  I am shifting to digital
> > because travelling with film has just got too hard.
> >
> > Marty
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
> Henning Wulff
> henningw at archiphoto.com
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from doug at ricecracker.net (doug kim) ([Leica] Security in Dublin Airport now insist on scanning film)
Message from curtisbliss at yahoo.com (CB) ([Leica] Security in Dublin Airport now insist on scanning film)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Security in Dublin Airport now insist on scanning film)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Security in Dublin Airport now insist on scanning film)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Security in Dublin Airport now insist on scanning film)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Security in Dublin Airport now insist on scanning film)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Security in Dublin Airport now insist on scanning film)