Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Here a shot from my trip to the Dutch island of Texel last year: http://www.frozenlight.eu/texel2011/content/20110618__IGP1597_large.html I feel that the humans in the image enhance it by providing a reference for scale, among other things. On the other hand, in this image (from the same trip), I am quite pleased that no humans are around: http://www.frozenlight.eu/texel2011/content/20110618__IGP1696_large.html Why? I have no idea, I am not into deep analysis of my pictures, it is all gut feeling. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ YNWA On May 23, 2012, at 5:30 PM, Marc Dufour wrote: > B&W option: 6 > Color option: 3 > Abstention: 1 > > It's clear the B&W concept easily prevails. > And basically for the same reason: the human figures distract the attention > in the color option, meanwhile they virtually disappear in the B&W. > I agree with this argument, indeed. > The question is: When is people disturbing in a landscape image? When do > they enhance it.? > I hadn't planned to include any human figure in the frame, when the couple > got closer. > Now I wonder if I should have to wait they gone. ! > > Thanks to all and each one of you: Jim, Herbert, Tina, Richard, Barry, Ted, > Jayanand, Aram, Bill and Philippe "Shumasher" Amard :-) > Best regards, > Marc > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >