Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Señoritas in the Subway
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 22:57:34 +0200
References: <2E14BCB6-10FC-417E-AFDA-2A9259977BC6@gmail.com> <E34DAD1C-90CE-4CC8-9B2A-7BA4E83DDCC4@sfr.fr> <207E25F383A04A2A8E901BA87F5BF358@syneticfeba505> <303CC509-21B6-40E5-A6C7-8080B4A30B42@gmail.com> <D6FB1973-7EF6-4745-9A27-A1AE217B3ECA@gmail.com> <29804582-8E7E-4A65-8171-FF8452D1D26C@btinternet.com>

Thank you Charlie, I'm agree too, is a nice moment and expression

cheers
Lluis


El 04/06/2012, a las 20:46, Charlie Chan escribi?:

> LLuis,
>
> No 2 is a great catch. The turn of the head, the eyes, the action.  
> Great
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Charlie
>
> Charlie Chan
> www.charlie-chan.co.uk
>
>
>
> On 4 Jun 2012, at 17:16, Steve Barbour wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> Steve Barbour
>>
>> On Jun 4, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Lluis Ripoll  
>> <lluisripollquerol at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Ted, buenos dias querido amigo!
>>
>> I thank very much your opinion, I always apreciate much more the  
>> constructive critics than the "everythin very nice", this made  
>> remember me when I was 15 I presented a film to a local Contest,  
>> I've no obtained nathing, somebody has said, we should gave him  
>> something for encourage this young boy!, and I've said, no thank  
>> you, wahta really help are the critics.
>>
>> good point Lluis, 2 is by far the preferred
>>
>> s
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Lluis
>>
>>
>> El 04/06/2012, a las 16:55, <tedgrant at shaw.ca> <tedgrant at shaw.ca>  
>> escribi?:
>>
>>> Lluis SHOWED:
>>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Subway/ 
>>>> L1026612BN.jpg.html>
>>>>
>>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Subway/L1026613BNw.jpg.html 
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Subway/L1026602BNw.jpg.html 
>>>> >
>>>
>>> Dear Lluis, Buenos d?as querido amigo!
>>>
>>> Photos 1 &3 really have nothing to them compared with N0.2.
>>> What we see in the second is a direct communication moment because  
>>> of the girls eyes and seemingly in conversation with the other two.
>>>
>>> Sorry about being so blunt about 1&3 but nothing is happening and  
>>> are merely exposures of nothing. Don't feel bad as we all make  
>>> exposures like this on occaison. ;-)
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> ted
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Señoritas in the Subway)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Señoritas in the Subway)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Señoritas in the Subway)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Señoritas in the Subway)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Señoritas in the Subway)
Message from topoxforddoc at btinternet.com (Charlie Chan) ([Leica] Señoritas in the Subway)