Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That is kind of funny. I'm sure they didn't see it that way, to the govt, it was just a business discrimination case, but yeah they did actually order someone to take pictures, lol. Maybe if the cops tell us to stop shooting, we can say we were hired to shoot by a gay client? LOL! Wouldn't work here in Indiana though. It is still perfectly legal to discriminate against gays here :( -- Chris Crawford Fine Art Photography Fort Wayne, Indiana 260-437-8990 http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work! http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798 Become a fan on Facebook On 6/16/12 11:07 PM, "Lew Schwartz" <lew1716 at gmail.com> wrote: >The thing that strikes me as ironic is that, while all of us know of >photogs who have been illegally prevented from photographing by >authorities >and, indeed, we may actually be some of those photogs, this is an instance >where authorities have found it illegal NOT to photograph. > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information