Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]They are only shooting JPEGs as the X-Pro1 has a new sensor style and the RAW converters have not caught up with it yet. The JPEG processing is all in camera so can cope with the sensor. If you are interested, read http://chromasoft.blogspot.co.nz/2012/05/demosaicing-fuji-x-pro1-and-its-x-trans.html - written by the author of PhotoRaw so knows what he is talking about...... john ________________________________________ It would take a lot to get me to waste one second getting me to shoot Jpegs. Do an search and see I you can find others using the Fuji X Pro-1 who feel they have to shoot jpegs. I can't find them. There will always be people who just don't give a hoot who will find a reason to shoot jpegs. - > > B.D., John, Howard - I do see the color smearing in the Adobe-processed > files, > but only clearly visible at 200%. No checkerboard anywhere, though, even > at > 300%. > > I do not see color smearing or checkerboard in Silky Pix RAW converted > files. > > Point taken in any case. Guess I'll shoot JPGs for a while myself. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > > Dick > > > > On Jun 26, 2012, at 6:37 PM, B. D. Colen wrote: > >> IF they are true RAW files, then the camera isn't doing anything to them - >> they are simply the data captured by the sensor - no sharpening, no in >> camera >> "correction." When they are converted to DNG, they are being converted to >> a >> theoretically lossless compressed format, but, again, are unaltered. Then >> the >> fun begins. Apparently the Adobe conversion is doing something wrong, >> because >> the files end up with a weird pattern - a sort of checkerboard pattern, >> with >> little crosses in the checkerboard squares, and dots, that I can see very >> faintly at 66 percent, and painfully clearly at 100 percent. >> Typed with big fingers on tiny keys >>