Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nikon forum advice (OT!)
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 05:01:12 +0000
References: <A7D9FE87-6EA2-4CB5-8EDE-5264223A8344@bex.net> <23C8D0A6-FB26-4844-91A6-DF6E3ECC9756@gmail.com>, <D3C592B5-D69C-4CAD-A02B-3DEA7C2AFEB8@bex.net>

Take a look at www.getdpi.com Nikon forum

John

On 9/07/2012, at 4:21 PM, "Howard Ritter" <hlritter at bex.net> wrote:

> Well, as luck would have it, since I had not seen today's updates on the 
> LUG in Barcelona thread, the thread has given rise to one on exactly the 
> lens I'm having a problem with, the new AF-S Nikkor 24-120 mm f/4G lens. I 
> got one to replace the earlier version, which as far as I was concerned 
> was only really weak in the corners, in hopes of better overall 
> performance and an additional stop at the longer FLs. 
> 
> The corner performance at  wide apertures at 24mm is just as horrible as 
> that of its predecessor, with worse chromatic aberration thrown in. The 
> central performance is a little better than that of the earlier version, 
> though contrast is deplorable wide open. I borrowed a copy of the new AF-S 
> Nikkor 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 zoom to compare size (much smaller diameter and 
> length), weight (one-third less), and performance in the context of its 
> price (55% less). 
> 
> At 24mm and f/5.6, in the corners, the cheaper 24-85 blows the '120 away 
> at the same aperture, and gives comparable image quality to the '120 in 
> the center. Its corner images are closer to those of the 24mm f/1.4 prime 
> at 5.6 than to those of the '120.
> 
> I'll post some examples tomorrow.
> 
> ?howard
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 2:17 PM, Leowesson wrote:
> 
>> Which lens?
>> 
>> Leo Wesson
>> www.leowesson.com
>> 
>> On Jul 8, 2012, at 10:55, Howard Ritter <hlritter at bex.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm deeply unhappy with an aspect of the performance of a new Nikon lens 
>>> I just bought. I suspect (hope) the problem is due to a defective lens 
>>> and is not characteristic of this design, since in this respect it is 
>>> significantly out-performed by a much cheaper and largely comparable 
>>> lens, both lenses being current and of recent design.
>>> 
>>> Which Nikon forum might be best to air this question in? I don't 
>>> participate in any forum other than the LUG, so I could use some 
>>> guidance. I have submitted my complaint, and some representative crops 
>>> of images to illustrate it, to Nikon tech support as well.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for any suggestions,
>>> 
>>> ?howard
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Mail was checked for spam by the Freeware Edition of CleanMail.
> The Freeware Edition is free for personal and non-commercial use.
> You can remove this notice by purchasing a full license!


In reply to: Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] Nikon forum advice (OT!))
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leowesson) ([Leica] Nikon forum advice (OT!))
Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] Nikon forum advice (OT!))