Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On the first pair, the MM seems sharper to me, on the second M9. On the others, I cannot tell the difference. Either way, the differences are subtle. Cheers, Nathan On 2 Sep 2012, at 15:02, Tina Manley wrote: > PESO: > > I put up some comparisons shot with the MM and M9. All used the same > lenses (mostly 90/2.0) and same exposures - usually 320 ISO. I used Silver > Efex Pro to convert the M9 ones to B&W using the Neutral choice. No noise > removal or sharpening. Auto Exposure in LR4 on each one. > > I can definitely tell the difference in the raw files. I'm not sure what > you can tell from small jpegs but here they are: > > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/145788353 > > and the next 7. > > C&C greatly appreciated. > > Tina > > -- > Tina Manley, ASMP > www.tinamanley.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman Blog: http://www.nathansmusings.eu/