Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New M/ BOKEH?????
From: frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE)
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:20:52 +0100 (BST)
References: <FE91FE22AEAE4ACD9CBEFEC063A89E51@syneticfeba505><CC82DB91.23D9D%mark@rabinergroup.com> <1348299034.34060.YahooMailNeo@web87404.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <82DB9F5FE14A45528041777594BB11D5@syneticfeba505>

Hi Doc.,
2 things.
The lenses you use have good boke, whether you chose them because of that or 
not...
Whether backgrounds are distraction depends both on the background and the 
framing. You are a master at framing.

You have dealt with the problem at source whether conciously or not.

FD

>________________________________
> From: "tedgrant at shaw.ca" <tedgrant at shaw.ca>
>To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> 
>Sent: Saturday, 22 September 2012, 10:41
>Subject: Re: [Leica] New M/ BOKEH?????
> 
>May I put this into a test of shooting a real documentary for one of my
>medical books.Those of you who do not have the pleasure of a copy of any of
>the three might not have one word to say.
>
>Here's how I work.
>
>I'm in scrubs, 3 M cameras around my neck, a couple of motor drive SLR 's
>hanging off shoulders with different lenses. And away I go with not one iota
>of a thought other than making sure everything is set for proper exposure!
>
>Now it is my eye that is canning the scene watching - looking for the
>twinkle in? an eye just over the mask, the helter skelter of hands holding
>instruments, the glint in an eye and doing all this without any techie
>thoughts or concerns about bokeh or many other things that always seem to
>put the fear of God into others their picture taking.
>
>Regardless of all the banter about many things.... Bokeh for example, never
>ever enters my mind nor nary an incline of thought as I'm concentrating on
>the many subjects.
>
>Just look through any of the book picture pages and point out to me where
>the bokeh is a distracting spoiling element in the intensity of the photo
>moment. For the life of me I cannot imagine it ever entering thought process
>as a new heart valve is being inserted into the heart of the patient.
>
>Please by my guest and tell me the plate number of the photo page and point
>out the bokeh spoiled photo.... thank you.
>
>cheers,
>Dr. ted :-)
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "FRANK DERNIE" <frank.dernie at btinternet.com>
>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 12:30 AM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] New M/ BOKEH?????
>
>
>> The thing is, Mark, you are a night owl. You go out taking pictures in low
>> light, and prefer to stop down a bit for DoF.
>> Not everybody does this.
>> I am in bed early and up at dawn. I mainly take pictures in good light,
>> and if it is less good I use my lenses wide open.
>> I don't care all that much about high iso performance, though I know you
>> do. Many are like me, I imagine, though we don't bang on about it thrice
>> daily.
>> If you shoot frequently wide open it is likely that between 50% and 95% of
>> the frame is OOF so, for people who do this boke is indeed important for
>> the overall look of the print, though of course it is the in-focus bit
>> that is important (usually).
>> IME the nature of the background makes more difference to the boke than
>> the lens itself. Sun through a leafy bush or tree being the most tricky
>> IME. I do not keep a lens if I don't like the boke, personally, so it is
>> not an issue for me.
>> All my Leica lenses have good or excellent boke. Most of my Canon lenses
>> do too. A few Nikon lenses have been disappointing and several of the
>> Voigtlander rangefinder lenses too. The 50mm f1.5 was very disappointing
>> in this regard.
>> My habits are very different from yours, so my requirements are also very
>> different.
>> cheers,
>> Frank Dernie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>________________________________
>>> From: Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>
>>>To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>Sent: Saturday, 22 September 2012, 8:05
>>>Subject: Re: [Leica] New M/ BOKEH?????
>>>
>>>In agreement where Ted is coming from the idea of good or bad bokeh being
>>>a
>>>deal breaker and really the main focus of why to buy one lens over another
>>>is so obsurd it makes my teeth hurt. Far more important would seem to be
>>>to
>>>focus ones attention on what's in focus.
>>>Vibration reduction is a huge thing. Huge.
>>>A paradigm shifter big time.
>>>If its conceivably possible that it would effect the out of focus areas of
>>>the image my big thought on the issue is: who the hell cares? You're hand
>>>holding a 30omm lens at a 50th of a second I say that's a reason to
>>>celebrate. And a reason to go out and make images like you never could
>>>before. Or stay in and do it in your living room... turn the lights down
>>>low. Not have to use a wide. Do a portrait session with a 90mm and
>>>candlelight.
>>>
>>>Mark William Rabiner
>>>Photography
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>


Replies: Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] New M/ BOKEH????? REPLY!)
In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] New M/ BOKEH?????)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] New M/ BOKEH?????)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] New M/ BOKEH?????)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] New M/ BOKEH?????)