Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:39:14 -0600 (CST)
References: <7452113.1354158181167.JavaMail.root@mswamui-chipeau.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

My iphone changed bokeh to broken.   Thanks, Doug, for still understanding 
what I was writing.   Your point, though, is not as self-obvious as it would 
first appear.   Linguists have found that different language groups divide 
the visible spectrum up in different ways and have names for different 
colors within the continuum of the spectrum, so that, for example,  some 
cultures  have only two words for the range from yellow through green to 
blue, omitting our word green.   When asked what they call what we see as 
green, they answer either yellow or blue, depending on where the shade of 
green falls.   They don't "see" green, only yellow and blue.   So does green 
exist for them?   No, it doesn't:  what they see is either yellow or blue.

Did bokeh exist for us before we borrowed the Japanese word for it and 
became aware of it?



On Nov 28, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> 
wrote:

> Robert Meier wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Nobody knew what broken was. 
>> 
> 
> We didn't have a word for it.  That doesn't preclude its existence.
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9…bokeh)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)