Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:54:06 -0500
References: <CAA4z8henoec71NKhCcYGUQsvmgozC+7d_AgFO21C0hZhSeTLxQ@mail.gmail.com>

very cool

ric


On Jan 18, 2013, at 11:47 PM, Gary Benson <bensonga at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think Jayanand may have received a bad copy of this lens.  I've had good
> results using my copy of the 24-120 f4 VR lens (current version, on both a
> D700 and D800e).  A friend of mine here in Alaska with a D800e has also had
> good results with this lens (and he is much more picky about lens IQ than
> me).  It has also received generally good reviews on the GetDPI forum from
> people using this lens on a D800.
> 
> Here are a couple of samples from my experience with this lens:
> 
> Color
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/bensonga/DSC_1199+ARR+1806+and+1802+CLR+XXXL.jpg.html
> 
> B&W
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/bensonga/DSC_1197+AK+RR+Engine+Revealed+BW+XXXL.jpg.html
> 
>> From my own experience, this lens is a keeper.
> 
> Gary Benson
> Eagle River, Alaska
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120)
In reply to: Message from bensonga at gmail.com (Gary Benson) ([Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120)