Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At this point its a widely used highly thought of very much desired piece of glass and certainly high on my list. Though I'm generally more fond of a more compact lightweight optic and I don't need the extreme zoom range a more conservative range I'm fine with. Like an 24 to 85.. Then I take that off and put on an 80 to 200 when I need that range. And I have a very lightweight sharp version of that lens now having had all kinds of versions of it before AF. On 1/18/13 11:54 PM, "Ric Carter" <ricc at embarqmail.com> wrote: > very cool > > ric > > > On Jan 18, 2013, at 11:47 PM, Gary Benson <bensonga at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think Jayanand may have received a bad copy of this lens. I've had good >> results using my copy of the 24-120 f4 VR lens (current version, on both a >> D700 and D800e). A friend of mine here in Alaska with a D800e has also >> had >> good results with this lens (and he is much more picky about lens IQ than >> me). It has also received generally good reviews on the GetDPI forum from >> people using this lens on a D800. >> >> Here are a couple of samples from my experience with this lens: >> >> Color >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/bensonga/DSC_1199+ARR+1806+and+1802+CLR+XXXL >> .jpg.html >> >> B&W >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/bensonga/DSC_1197+AK+RR+Engine+Revealed+BW+X >> XXL.jpg.html >> >>> From my own experience, this lens is a keeper. >> >> Gary Benson >> Eagle River, Alaska >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/