Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/02/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Misrepresentation
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca)
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:04:37 -0800
References: <CAH1UNJ1qRmuhRarEd8-dFUTK4_-i3QWez9k8+mv9mMsXTMhc_w@mail.gmail.com><C6FCD9F6-2748-411F-B485-67A4B3EB886E@frozenlight.eu><AB25FC23-4CFF-4F8B-9C0E-89844B7730E5@mac.com><89D1411A-569D-4232-A6DE-B6997BAF09EA@bex.net><CAF8hL-FeBGKYZTBjzO9kAa=PsBSAVmSnHhvL1w_1JseeiN-BSw@mail.gmail.com> <4EB23A08-F285-4578-84B0-BED7DD598405@mac.com>

Hi Crew,
Well I'm not the least iota of forgiving for sloppy journalism nor 
photojournalism! PERIOD! Yes at times errors are made by.........  "A ROOKIE 
JUST STARTING OUT!"  We've ALL HAD ONE AND BEEN  FORGIVEN ONE....... "as a 
rookie!"

In this case? HE'S AN ELITE OF THE ELITE......  MAGNUM PHOTOGRAPHERS DO NO 
WRONG!

Aren't we supposed to be looking at and trying to emulate what the elite of 
the elite photojournalists are supposed to be........ "MAGNUM 
PHOTOGRAPHERS?" the best in the world?

One question? If this is the elite of the elite we're supposed to look up to 
as the be all to end all of the best of the best? Supposedly leaving us 
completely in awe because they are "MAGNUM PHOTOGRAPHERS!" And pulls off a 
crapper like this and makes excuses (lies)  himself out of the mess that he 
knew he was doing wrong in the first place. I'd think there should be a 
tongue lashing by whomever of MAGNUM, if nothing else and being on some kind 
of probation for a year because he has belittled MAGNUM the Agency and all 
their photographers!

He certainly isn't a person, nor now an organization I'd want my children 
learning to be a photojournalist to look up to.

If MAGNUM  had the balls ........ "THEY'D FIRE HIM!" Don't look to see it 
happen!

regards,
Dr. Ted Grant













"
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Misrepresentation


>
> On Feb 24, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Richard Man wrote:
>
>> I see this has been discussed. I like Mr. Pellegrin's response (finally). 
>> I
>> do not see any malice, just unfortunate coincidence.
>> https://nppa.org/node/36604
>>
>> Comparing to the doctored "Best Landscapes" and the like photos, I do not
>> think this ranks with those sorry stories.
>
> He does seem to need to take better notes or simplify his captions.
>
> This one also seems "wrong"
> <http://www.magnumphotos.com/image/NYC125934.html>
> in so far as the gun does not belong to Brett (not Breet).
>
> If you're going to work in journalism and documentary
> best not be this sloppy on the word end;
> or be working with some very good assistants, and or word smiths.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 



Replies: Reply from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Misrepresentation)
Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] Misrepresentation)
In reply to: Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Misrepresentation)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Misrepresentation)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Misrepresentation)
Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] Misrepresentation)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Misrepresentation)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Misrepresentation)