Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Monochrom review in Pop Photog
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 19:25:02 +0000
References: <5138458A.2040807@threshinc.com> <CD5DCC26.621B%mark@rabinergroup.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9B5327716@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <BD7B2CD0-ECA1-494C-A1C4-BA8B961344F8@mac.com>

Ouch, I had managed to not look at those!

john

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Those images are horrible samples.
> 
> 
> Chris Williams
> 
> On Mar 7, 2013, at 2:02 PM, John McMaster wrote:
> 
> > I think they missed the point, didn't look at image tonality and 
> > malleability
> compared to converted colour shot.
> >
> > john
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >>
> >> http://www.popphoto.com/gear/2013/02/camera-test-leica-m-
> monochrom
> >>
> >>
> >> In what starts out looking like a bad review because it looks like they 
> >> are
> >> saying the rez on the Monochrom is only slightly better then the M9 
> >> turns
> >> out to be not that at all but a rave review as they are using the L 
> >> word:
> >> Love in the summation and before.
> >>
> >>
> >> Part of what complicates a direct comparison it seems is a black and 
> >> white
> >> image needs less noise reduction as there are no colors to get rid of 
> >> color
> >> effects from noise they seem to be saying.
> >> ??
> >>
> >> --
> >> Mark William Rabiner
> >


Replies: Reply from zoeica at mac.com (chris williams) ([Leica] Monochrom review in Pop Photog)
In reply to: Message from pklein at threshinc.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] my leica monochrom review in rangefinder)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Monochrom review in Pop Photog)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Monochrom review in Pop Photog)
Message from zoeica at mac.com (chris williams) ([Leica] Monochrom review in Pop Photog)