Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/05/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] a photographer sued
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 14:19:00 -0500
References: <CAEve6Xiz92RtAZd9u_FpBd2+w9nmsKCPux1OWbQ6LMtwofUb9w@mail.gmail.com> <CDC8640F.A2C1%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CABmfTOWWEscjvf3k3mbQv3sTSn0E+uFEcVrHi7=oho-hR710sg@mail.gmail.com> <7C585A4F-C9A6-4111-9B75-FBBB7C9F05BA@gmail.com> <CAFuU78f7MQsyP1Q6NAT5bhU32ENRHaNAj8YZpJXVCyNgQ84PpQ@mail.gmail.com> <AF0D1B0B-0931-4723-8DBE-D94B67214A54@mac.com> <6823D73FB6A047D19AA7EAC075A40598@billHP> <CDFB3CD7-119F-476F-BADA-8A7290178E30@earthlink.net> <BFBABCB6-D35B-48EF-BB93-EE3639932BDC@mac.com> <D557C82F-4475-49E1-A628-D7080678B804@mac.com> <0C69D2BEE8F34FE581214AF3E326EE0D@syneticfeba505> <01fc01ce5c97$7617c750$624755f0$@cox.net> <9BA40B5D-817E-4A46-8238-CBEBE70D28C0@mac.com> <020501ce5ca0$5b80e620$1282b260$@cox.net>
On May 29, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Ken Carney wrote:
> Do you all feel the same way about the pedestrians walking by and looking
> in?
> or the neighbors in the next building taking a peek?
> or the neighbors with binoculars taking a peek?
> or the neighbors with telescopes taking a peek?
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
> I was OK until we got to the binoculars and telescopes :)
:~) yes. and that's the only point I'm interested in making.
We each have a very personal line drawn as to what's acceptable.
Some don't believe anyone has a right to photograph them - even in a public
place.
Some expect privacy even as they live their lives in fishbowls.
I find the lines being drawn quite as interesting as the "art" - the law
suit - and every other aspect of this "case"
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
In reply to:
Message from scleroplex at gmail.com (scleroplex) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from bcaldwell51 at earthlink.net (Bryan Caldwell) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] a photographer sued)