[Leica] Fuji XE-1 - Mark

[piers.hemy at gmail.com (Piers Hemy)]

Philippe, I suspect that you are a user of the said X10, and your view is
therefore unduly biased. Permit me to agree with you, with the clear
disclaimer that I too am a user of the X10, and equally biased. Any other
camera I have used which is capable of producing a raw file - no question, I
always prefer to have a raw file. But the odd design of the X10 sensor, it
seems to me, has two effects - it is more complicated to make 'after-market'
raw processors (Adobe Camera Raw, for example) but by exploiting the sensor
design it is easier to extract very pleasing results direct from the camera.


But I have no wish to persuade others to abandon their long and fervently
held beliefs.

Piers

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+piers.hemy=gmail.com at leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+piers.hemy=gmail.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
philippe.amard
Sent: 05 June 2013 11:39
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Fuji XE-1 - Mark


Le 5 juin 13 ? 12:02, Mark Rabiner a ?crit :

> But on the lists I have long learned that there is no correlation 
> between the money and care people spend on gear and the amount they 
> care about their final images.


the x10 is less than $300 worth Mark ...

And the final results in JPEG are statistically speaking better than what LR
delivers from the RAW, not to speak of the final JPEG conversion loss ...

Try one, or listen to the down-to-earth French guy if there's such a guy
around the block ;-)

Amiti?s
Philippe

One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to the
eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE





_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information