Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGs: On Assignment (from Ted Grant): Motion GEORGE LOTTERMOSER.
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca)
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:28:40 -0700
References: <CC162AFF-2ADE-43C7-B5B7-BDDBC22DF8FB@mac.com>

George Lottermoser SHOWED:

" <imagist3 at mac.com>
To: "Group Users Leica" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 8:33 PM
Subject: [Leica] IMGs: On Assignment (from Ted Grant): Motion


>c & c always welcome and appreciated
>
> <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=7725>

Hi George,,
Good motion, enough blurr to see what it is and feel their riding and 
moving. The amount of blurr of the moving object and the 
background/foreground should never be so much the scene merely becomes a 
mass of colours or B&W and not recognizable what it really is in the 
photograph.

In your case they are about right. I think using this technique is better 
illustrated in colour than B&W! That's always a debatable question between 
photographers. :-) However we wont debate! ;-)

cheers,
Dr. ted




Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMGs: On Assignment (from Ted Grant): Motion GEORGE LOTTERMOSER.)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMGs: On Assignment (from Ted Grant): Motion)