Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/09/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT. Nikon screen brightness and contrast
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:35:21 +0100
References: <CE602825.10BFE%mark@rabinergroup.com>

My experience too, though I haven't tried the very new WA lenses. My MATE, 
WATE and 90mm macro go everywhere since their weight is negligible. A fast 
90 only goes in the bag if I need the speed...
FD

On 19 Sep, 2013, at 09:03, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/wa-tri-elmar.shtml
> 
> " To my mind the WA-TE, price aside, comes off as the winner in this
> category. Image quality is excellent; having three focal lengths in one 
> adds
> versatility; and build quality is as good as it gets. It is rangefinder
> coupled, and 8 bit coded. What it gives up in aperture to the Distagon it
> makes up for in lower weight and smaller size. All of this makes the
> 16-18-21mm Tri-Elmar the Goldilocks of ultra-wide lenses for the Leica M8.
> For those not needing ultimate wide aperture lenses, in combination with 
> the
> original Tri-Elmar this lens makes an unbeatable light weight travel duo,
> offering focal lengths on an M8 from 21 - 70mm equivalent in six steps.
> Pricey, to be sure. But very versatile."
> 
> On 9/18/13 8:04 PM, "John McMaster" <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
> 
>> Never heard it called that, usually WATE (Wide Angle Tri-Elmar) to 
>> complement
>> the MATE (Medium Angle Tri-Elmar) ;-)
>> 
>> john
>> ________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> By the way I check its not what I put down on the email: a 35-50-28  I 
>> find
>> its the LEICA TRI-ELMAR-M 16-18-21 mm f/4 ASPH.  Called by some the Super
>> Wide Tri Elmar or
>> 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photographer
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/18/13 11:54 AM, "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> And a very fine tool for the street as demonstrated by Lluis on the 
>>> streets
>>> here right now. I tried it briefly on the new camera too and it could
>>> become very addictive.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Geoff
>>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 19 September 2013 00:22, FRANK DERNIE <frank.dernie at 
>>> btinternet.com>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> It focuses fine between focal lengths, though I can't say I have
>>>> deliberately checked infinity, but have taken Leica at their word.
>>>> 
>>>> The MATE is not a zoom, and Leica advise against using between FL click
>>>> stops (unlike their advice on the WATE). Since the standard sequence for
>>>> focal length of the frame lines is 35-50-28 the FL ring goes from 35 to 
>>>> 50
>>>> to 28 which makes impossible smooth transition through the focal 
>>>> lengths,
>>>> so it has rapid ramps and detents on the FL cams for just those 3 focal
>>>> lengths.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz>
>>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 18 September 2013, 11:34
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] OT. Nikon screen brightness and contrast
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does it focus to infinity in between fixed focal lengths? The MATE will
>>>> not focus over a couple of metres when between FLs...
>>>>> 
>>>>> john
>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> As it happens, it is a zoom lens and is perfectly useable with in 
>>>>> between
>>>> focal lengths, it just has no viewfinder appropriate, though the new 
>>>> camera
>>>> has a live view function which resolves that.
>>>>> FD
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 18 Sep, 2013, at 07:24, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> For the M there is the TRI-ELMAR-M 16-18-21 mm f/4 ASPH
>>>>>> And I could convince myself it was a zoom. Its just missing a few of
>>>> the in
>>>>>> between focal lenghs.
>>>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photographer
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] OT. Nikon screen brightness and contrast)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT. Nikon screen brightness and contrast)