Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:21 PM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I shot some low light wide open shots of some of my high school > classmates about 4 years ago. I thought they were good, but the pics > weren't received well on the LUG. They really can't compare to the > Noctilux picture quality, but for an amateur the lens is worth the money. any chance of my seeing them Jeffery? if possible, much appreciated, Steve > > > Ken Rockwell despises it, but who knows why. I wouldn't consider selling > mine. > > Sent from my iPad > > Jeffery L. Smith > New Orleans, Louisiana > USA > > On Oct 21, 2013, at 22:58, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> By the way, I picked up the newly revised Voigtlander 50/1.5 Nokton from >>> Stephen Gandy a short while back, but haven't had a break at work long >>> enough to allow me to use it. >> >> >> >> have you used the Voigtlander Nokton 50mm f1.1 ? Impression? >> >> >>> >>> Jeffery >>> >>> >>> On Oct 21, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> you guys need to talk with Jeffery Smith >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> s >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 21, 2013, at 12:09 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have a quantity of 50mm lenses (my most used focal length) from >>>>> 1950s DR to current FLE, they all have a different look with good and >>>>> bad points for each ;-) >>>>> >>>>> john >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> Overgaard ranks the various 50 mm lenses with the best being the >>>>>> latest with >>>>>> a floating element. Bear in mind that the differences are subtile and >>>>>> certainly >>>>>> not apparent on a computer screen. In fact I doubt that you could see >>>>>> any >>>>>> difference in lens quality short of examining a really large sized >>>>>> paper print. A >>>>>> good read, though. Thanks, Steve. >>>>>> Larry Z >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information