Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/11/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question
From: j2m46 at hotmail.fr (Jean-Michel Mertz)
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 19:11:50 +0100
References: <BC996CCC-642A-439A-9648-C0EC23220C53@sfr.fr>

Hi Philippe,
b) is my favourite! 
 
You ok?
JM 


Jean-Michel Mertz
Strasbourg

 
> From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr
> To: lug at leica-users.org
> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:35:08 +0100
> CC: leicareflex at freelists.org; olympus at thomasclausen.net
> Subject: [Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question
> 
> I was in Paris last Saturday and had to get to the drugstore near my  
> daughter's place.
> 
> I found this friendly pair among endangered species deserved  
> "immortality" and asked them if I could take a snap, which they  
> spontaneously agreed to.
> 
> So my question now is which one do you think works better if either  
> does. And why svp.
> 
> a)
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370977-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+2-4113.jpg
> 
> or b)
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370973-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+3-4114.jpg
> 
> Thank you in anticipation.
> 
> Philippe
> 
> 
> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible  
> to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
> NO ARCHIVE
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
                                          


In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)