Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/11/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:30:28 +0100
References: <BC996CCC-642A-439A-9648-C0EC23220C53@sfr.fr>

Philippe,

BRAVO!

Je pr?f?re la a, mais avec ?a?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyvEtT_Tko4

Amiti?s
Lluis


El 01/11/2013, a las 18:35, philippe.amard <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> 
escribi?:

> I was in Paris last Saturday and had to get to the drugstore near my 
> daughter's place.
> 
> I found this friendly pair among endangered species deserved "immortality" 
> and asked them if I could take a snap, which they spontaneously agreed to.
> 
> So my question now is which one do you think works better if either does. 
> And why svp.
> 
> a)
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370977-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+2-4113.jpg
> 
> or b)
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370973-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+3-4114.jpg
> 
> Thank you in anticipation.
> 
> Philippe
> 
> 
> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to 
> the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
> NO ARCHIVE
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)