Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/11/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leicaflex values
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:38:29 +0100
References: <6590944.1384534684408.JavaMail.root@mswamui-bichon.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <BLU0-SMTP522B9A2AD6849E1F850328CFB0@phx.gbl>

Well if it's an SL, the lenses can't be the later R ones ...
The bay will tell you a lot as already stated


APSC

Le 15 nov. 13 ? 18:11, Vick Ko a ?crit :

> Yep
>
> As a recent recovered Leicaflex nut, I found perfectly fantastic  
> bodies at $100.  Some far less.
>
> The SL2 bodies were worth a lot more, in the $400 to $500 range.
>
> But, the lenses are where the value was.   Especially the later year  
> R lenses.
>
> I am guessing that the R lenses are still valued, for using with  
> Canon or modified for Nikon mount.
>
> And now, the M-240 can use the lenses with adapter.
>
> Anyway, ebay solds and keh.com are very useful for establishing  
> market price.
>
>
> Good luck
>
> Vick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible  
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE






Replies: Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Leicaflex values)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Leicaflex values)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Leicaflex values)