Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is a dumb as it gets. What an embarrassment! On 1/12/14 7:22 PM, "Douglas Barry" <imra at iol.ie> wrote: > "Steve Barbour" <steve.barbour at gmail.com> commented on >> On Jan 11, 2014, at 9:32 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> >> wrote: >> >>> If one is going to shoot 36 or 72 pictures this week than fine. Film or >>> digital not much of a difference. But if like many people shooting >>> digital >>> opens you up to shooting intensively hundreds of shots per week or more >>> then >>> there is a big difference on a number of levels. Cost being one of the >>> first >>> ones. And dare I say quality of final final output because that's for >>> sure >>> the other one. >>> And this is where we get the "shooting too many pictures being sloppy >>> technique" baloney gets put in. and that's pure garbage. There is no such >>> thing as "over shooting". In film days I always bought film by the brick >>> and shot film by the brick. Assuming I had money. And not everybody's >>> got >>> money all the time. We always told ourselves and our clients "film is >>> cheap" >>> and that was of course a bit of BS. >> >> shoot more, you are bound to get some better images, of course those who > pride themselves for shooting "only 6 or 10 pics" , won't know this.... >> s >> > Chimp away, Mark. After all what does planning a picture count for? Sure > doesn't everybody know that if you give a thousand monkeys paints and > brushes they'll create a masterpiece. It must be so. Doesn't it say so on > the internet? > > Pass the plate of bananas when you're going..... > > Douglas > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/