Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]"Steve Barbour" <steve.barbour at gmail.com> commented on > On Jan 11, 2014, at 9:32 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > >> If one is going to shoot 36 or 72 pictures this week than fine. Film or >> digital not much of a difference. But if like many people shooting >> digital >> opens you up to shooting intensively hundreds of shots per week or more >> then >> there is a big difference on a number of levels. Cost being one of the >> first >> ones. And dare I say quality of final final output because that's for >> sure >> the other one. >> And this is where we get the "shooting too many pictures being sloppy >> technique" baloney gets put in. and that's pure garbage. There is no such >> thing as "over shooting". In film days I always bought film by the brick >> and shot film by the brick. Assuming I had money. And not everybody's >> got >> money all the time. We always told ourselves and our clients "film is >> cheap" >> and that was of course a bit of BS. > > shoot more, you are bound to get some better images, of course those who pride themselves for shooting "only 6 or 10 pics" , won't know this.... > s > Chimp away, Mark. After all what does planning a picture count for? Sure doesn't everybody know that if you give a thousand monkeys paints and brushes they'll create a masterpiece. It must be so. Doesn't it say so on the internet? Pass the plate of bananas when you're going..... Douglas