Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Anyone here tried Platinum printing?
From: topoxforddoc at btinternet.com (Charlie Chan)
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:35:52 +0100
References: <sNbl1n00N0AFV7C01NbqYX> <5354570D.6010201@cox.net>

Dear Ken and Pablo,

Well I ain't tried it yet. TBH I would only do this if I can make a digital 
negative on my Epson 3800. Just can't see myself making a large contact 
inter-negative using LF film. Willing to give it a go, once I've been on a 
course.

Best wishes,

Charlie

On 21 Apr 2014, at 00:23, Ken Carney wrote:

> We'll see.  I have a much better Epson now than when I tried digital negs 
> before, and it appears there is much better inkjet film available now.  
> But, I have the printer and a first-rate pt/pd lab at hand, so it won't 
> cost much to try it out.  The ability to print negs from digital camera 
> files and control the dMax with software is really appealing.  So, I'm 
> curious again.
> 
> Ken
> 
> 
> On 4/20/2014 5:35 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>> I'd do this and not go the Epson route. Work from enlarged Negs.  I viewed
>> some of these Platinum prints from Epson "negs" at the AIPAD show at the
>> Park Ave Armory last week or so and they are washed out looking and don't
>> look at all good. Including the ones done to Elliot Erwitt iconic work. An
>> excuse to sell prints with another zero at the end. I'm a big fan of his I
>> don't think he has much to do with this.
>> 
>> Platinum prints are supposed to be rich and dark. Not the opposite. And
>> incredibly sharp. Not the opposite.
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/19/14 6:15 PM, "Ken Carney" <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> It is a lot of fun.  Most all of my pt/pd printing was with LF in-camera
>>> negs, but I have experimented with inkjet and film negatives made with
>>> an imagesetter (ask your grandparents what that is :)).  As far as
>>> sharpness goes anyway, it is a forgiving process due to the paper used.
>>> Tonality is a different thing, but some of the best prints I have seen
>>> were 6x7cm negs enlarged in the darkroom to 20x24 by David Kennedy
>>> (www.davidmichaelkennedy.com).  These were pure palladium, double
>>> coated.  The chemistry presents some health concerns, not the least of
>>> which is mixing the emulsion in a shot glass, which in dim light looks a
>>> lot like single-malt.  Good luck.
>>> 
>>> Ken
>>> 
>>> On 4/19/2014 4:46 PM, Charlie Chan wrote:
>>>> Just thought I would ask. I am thinking of going on a Platinum-Palladium
>>>> printing course with David Chow in the UK. Now one can make large format
>>>> digital negatives on an Epson printer, it seems like a bit of fun. Is 
>>>> anyone
>>>> on the LUG doing this? If so, am I mad or have I got too much time on my
>>>> hands? Don't think I'll be the next Irving Penn, so no delusional 
>>>> thoughts
>>>> there.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> Charlie
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Charlie Chan
>>>> www.yourbreast.co.uk
>>>> www.charlie-chan.co.uk
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Anyone here tried Platinum printing?)