Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RIP, my newspaper
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:28:17 -0500
References: <mailman.6376.1427670367.1819.lug@leica-users.org> <0889EEC9-1A49-41ED-9F96-356DE957047B@netvigator.com> <5518B864.5010903@lighttube.net> <CAFU3ovK_oLeFrziqb9uZJoOtqfLXi5nUjWoF882HuxQKORetYQ@mail.gmail.com> <000f01d06b02$70ddb8f0$52992ad0$@ca> <a2c2a10496252efe0e634cccba44d02f@mail.gmail.com>

Jim,

I read it each week, and I would agree that it has been rather thin 
lately.  However, some of those were special issues.  Time and Forbes 
are enough to keep me busy during the time I have available for 
reading.  I get most of my current news from the internet.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 3/30/2015 11:43 AM, Jim Shulman wrote:
> Have anyone seen a recent copy of Time?  I've had desk blotters that were
> thicker.
>
> J
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] 
> On
> Behalf Of Ted Grant
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 11:59 AM
> To: 'Leica Users Group'
> Subject: Re: [Leica] RIP, my newspaper
>
> Peter Klein OFFERED:
> Subject: Re: [Leica] RIP, my newspaper
>
> .....The answer is that the media do not think that their American
> readership is interested in anything international except if it directly
> affects the U.S., or if it somehow confirms or (occasionally) refutes a
> dominant American attitude. Or if it is horriffic, or has something to do
> with sex, and the more outrageous the better.
>
> Compare the U.S. vs. International editions of major American
> publications.
> You'll get a rude shock.  Also, compare a 1950s or 60s edition of Time or
> Newsweek with a recent one. You'll find less content, less depth, and a
> much lower grade-level of writing. None of this is accidental. The
> publications life blood is the delivery of eyeballs to advertisers. They
> know that today's American eyeballs, on average, will not stay on the page
> of intelligent, in-depth articles long enough to see the ads.<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> UNFORTUNATELY SO TRUE !!! :-(
>
> ted
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] RIP, my newspaper)
In reply to: Message from cummer at netvigator.com (H&ECummer) ([Leica] RIP, my newspaper)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] RIP, my newspaper)
Message from boulanger.croissant at gmail.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] RIP, my newspaper)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] RIP, my newspaper)
Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] RIP, my newspaper)