Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RIP, my newspaper
From: tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:14:22 -0400
References: <mailman.6376.1427670367.1819.lug@leica-users.org> <0889EEC9-1A49-41ED-9F96-356DE957047B@netvigator.com> <5518B864.5010903@lighttube.net> <CAFU3ovK_oLeFrziqb9uZJoOtqfLXi5nUjWoF882HuxQKORetYQ@mail.gmail.com> <000f01d06b02$70ddb8f0$52992ad0$@ca> <a2c2a10496252efe0e634cccba44d02f@mail.gmail.com>

We got the latest Time yesterday.  The cover story is on Cuba.  There were
a couple of good photos but the rest would have gotten a 1 in LR and been
discarded if they had been mine.  I don't get it.

At least this issue was on world issues.  Usually the USA version has a
cover story on entertainment or health (ME issues) and the international
version has a cover story on what's really important in the world.

Dumbed down for the USA.

Tina

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Jim Shulman <jshulman at judgecrater.com>
wrote:

> Have anyone seen a recent copy of Time?  I've had desk blotters that were
> thicker.
>
> J
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] 
> On
> Behalf Of Ted Grant
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 11:59 AM
> To: 'Leica Users Group'
> Subject: Re: [Leica] RIP, my newspaper
>
> Peter Klein OFFERED:
> Subject: Re: [Leica] RIP, my newspaper
>
> .....The answer is that the media do not think that their American
> readership is interested in anything international except if it directly
> affects the U.S., or if it somehow confirms or (occasionally) refutes a
> dominant American attitude. Or if it is horriffic, or has something to do
> with sex, and the more outrageous the better.
>
> Compare the U.S. vs. International editions of major American
> publications.
> You'll get a rude shock.  Also, compare a 1950s or 60s edition of Time or
> Newsweek with a recent one. You'll find less content, less depth, and a
> much lower grade-level of writing. None of this is accidental. The
> publications life blood is the delivery of eyeballs to advertisers. They
> know that today's American eyeballs, on average, will not stay on the page
> of intelligent, in-depth articles long enough to see the ads.<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> UNFORTUNATELY SO TRUE !!! :-(
>
> ted
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html


In reply to: Message from cummer at netvigator.com (H&ECummer) ([Leica] RIP, my newspaper)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] RIP, my newspaper)
Message from boulanger.croissant at gmail.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] RIP, my newspaper)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] RIP, my newspaper)
Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] RIP, my newspaper)