Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mine would include a much better live view solution, and an orientable rear screen. from my iPad Sonny Carter > On Nov 18, 2015, at 8:52 PM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> > wrote: > > Not that I am Leica :-), but what are your criteria for a better-than-M240 > M? > >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Agree. And I'm hoping they will come out with a new M that will meet some >> needs of mine currently not met... >> >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Leica does not claim the SL as the M solution. Only that it can take M >>> lens. For product sales, it makes a lot of sense to keep the lines >> separate >>> >>>> On Wednesday, November 18, 2015, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I decided to plop down the ~$35 for the Reid Reviews. I wanted to know >>> how >>>> my 35/2 performed on the SL. He tests that lens specifically as well >> as a >>>> few other wides. >>>> As he asks not to "distribute that information", I can only say that, >> as >>> a >>>> landscape photographer and one who also shoots below f/5.6 in other >>>> situations, I am not the least bit interested in the SL anymore... >>>> Best, >>>> Bob > -- > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto > // https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information