Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/12/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's a long time since I had a good snigger. Maybe I should let loose this time. Seriously, Richard, do as you see best. As you've said, let those pairings that people have chosen as such stand, and mess with the rest. My pictures, especially this year, were chosen with the LUG in mind and not as a pairing. Put them where they'll do the most good. My $0.03Cdn (very close to $0.02US these days). Henning Wulff hjwulff at gmail.com On 2015-12-19, at 2:38 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> wrote: > I think we are taking ourselves too seriously. I though this yearbook > was initiated as a fun project to bond the group together - at least, > I have always approached it in that spirit. Why undermine and condemn > something, just because it is a new approach, without seeing the > results? After all, who buys the book except all of us? Are we such > Luddites, that we are so fixed in our ideas, and wedded to the past? > Loosen up guys, don't be so critical of those who actually are doing > all the work! It is very easy to stand on the sidelines and snipe and > grouse endlessly when you have no responsibility for the execution. At > the very least have the courage to be public with your misgivings, > instead of cribbing and sniggering behind people's backs, which I, for > one, consider as unacceptable and unfair behaviour. > > This is my $0.02 > > Cheers > Jayanand > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 19-Dec-2015, at 14:31, Robert Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Richard, >> >> Please explain what this means, "The image size will be maximized." Are >> you >> changing the size of images selected? Will that cause distortion or >> cropping. >> >> I am going against the grain of support expressed so far. I don't care if >> my images are together or not. I think a unilateral decision by the person >> who has volunteered to compile the work of our group to suddenly self >> promote themselves to "editor" is pretentious. Quite frankly, I've never >> seen your editing work nor that of your wife who has, as I believe you >> stated, more artistic talent than you. I am concerned that suddenly we >> have >> an "editor" with no evidence of editing capability. >> >> I always thought of this as a group project. Now it has become more of a >> "bound gallery" project with a self appointed gallery editor. I'm glad you >> recognize that this is a last minute change. But stating, "The image size >> will be maximized" is not something I understand. If I sized an image for >> the right side of a page, will it remain on the right side of a page? Now >> you say the pages will only have titles and we will need to see who took >> it >> by looking in the back of the book. Another global change without >> discussion. Unilateral, last minute, no explanation of why that's better >> nor asking for input, nor evidencing your experience as to why this is >> better. >> >> I understand those who speak loudest and contribute often to this group >> are >> expressing support. I do know, from private emails, others are upset with >> this coupe and we will not be seeing their images. >> >> So be my $0.02. >> Best, >> Bob > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >